Home / Methodology

How We Test & Rate Casino Games

Info By Updated 29 Jul 2026 1 article in section

How we test games: we play the free demo, log the mechanics spin by spin, and rely on published ELK Studios figures rather than marketing claims.

What a score actually means here

Pirots 5 symbol collection screen we logged during testing
A Pirots 5 feature screen from our demo sessions.

Every rating on this site starts the same way: we load the free demo and play it until the features stop surprising us. For Pirots 5 that meant sessions in August 2026 across a desktop browser and both Android and iOS mobile, watching the four collector birds fill their meters, the grid climb from 6x6 to 8x8, and the bonuses arrive at their own unhurried pace. A slot's marketing sheet will tell you it is thrilling. The demo tells you whether that is true. We trust the second one.

Our number is out of 10. Pirots 5 sits at 8.0. Below is exactly how a figure like that gets built, and, just as important, what we cannot see and refuse to guess.

How we test a game, step by step

No stopwatch drama, no invented jackpots. Here is the actual routine.

Play the demo

We run the publicly hosted free-play version across several sessions on more than one device. We are looking for how the mechanics feel in motion, not for a lucky spin. With Pirots 5 that means watching the birds collect in payout order, gems cascade in to refill the grid, and features build slowly the way a medium-high volatility slot tends to.

Log the mechanics

We write down what each feature does and how it chains. Collection meters, grid expansion, the Secret Door rotation, the Cursed Temple coin game on the 8x8 layout. We describe behaviour we observed, and we keep it qualitative unless a number is officially published.

Read the real spec

Marketing loses every argument with the published sheet. For the hard numbers, the 96% default RTP, the 10,000x max win, the $0.20 to $100 bet range, we go to ELK Studios' own Pirots 5 page and cross-check against established review databases. If a claim only lives in a press release, it gets flagged as such.

Resolve conflicts

Sources disagree. One outlet calls the volatility "high," another "medium-high." Rather than pick the flattering one, we quote the spread and tell you review sites score it 7 out of 10. Where a figure is disputed, you get the honest range, not a false certainty.

Set the score

The rating weighs feature depth, how the maths treats a normal bankroll, the RTP a typical operator actually serves, and how the game stacks up against its own series. It is an editorial judgement made by the reviewer who ran the sessions, informed by the demo and the spec, not a formula we pretend is objective.

Published spec beats a hype line, every time

When a studio's marketing and its published maths disagree, we go with the maths. The clearest example on this game is the return-to-player figure, and it is worth walking through because it shows what we mean by "we flag things."

Pirots 5 ships with a 96% default RTP. That is genuinely good news; it is the first mainline Pirots to break the 94% ceiling the earlier games sat under. But 96% is only the top model. ELK builds the slot with five operator-configurable RTP models, running all the way down to 87%, and the one you actually get is chosen by the casino, not the studio. A page that quotes "96%" and stops there is not lying, exactly, but it is showing you the best case and hoping you assume it is the only case. We quote the full 96 / 94 / 92 / 90 / 87% spread on every page, because that gap is the single biggest hidden variable in what the game returns to you.

What we can verify

The grid, the engine, the bet range, the max win, the RTP models, the feature list, the release window, the licences. These are published or plainly observable in the demo, and we cite where each comes from.

What we can't

Exact gem-tier paytable bands beyond a rough 0.05x to 25x range, the real bonus trigger frequency, the average bonus payout, the certification lab. ELK has not published these. So we say they are unpublished rather than dress up a guess as data.

Where our method falls short

A demo cannot tell you everything, and pretending otherwise would be the opposite of the point. Free-play credits do not carry the weight of your own money, so we can describe how features arrive and how the grid grows, but we can't quote you a real hit-rate from "our session" or a jackpot we happened to land. Anyone who does that is inventing numbers. When we mention hit rate at all, we say roughly one in four spins does something and we mark it as review-sourced, not an official ELK figure.

We also test at one moment in time. Operators tweak which RTP model they serve, feature buy is banned in the UK and restricted in other markets, and availability shifts by region. So treat our review as a well-tested snapshot with its assumptions on the table, not a promise about the exact game your casino will hand you. The same caution shapes how we vet operators, which is why where we suggest playing gets its own scrutinised write-up rather than a blind endorsement.

Sources

Pages in this section